[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200908204435.GA875620@bogus>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 14:44:35 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Eddie James <eajames@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, joel@....id.au,
bradleyb@...ziesquirrel.com, broonie@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] dt-bindings: fsi: fsi2spi: Document new restricted
property
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 12:02:25PM -0500, Eddie James wrote:
> Add documentation for the "fsi2spi,restricted" property which indicates
> a controller shouldn't sequence loops and therefore has a smaller
> transfer size.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eddie James <eajames@...ux.ibm.com>
> Acked-by: Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/ibm,fsi2spi.yaml | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/ibm,fsi2spi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/ibm,fsi2spi.yaml
> index b26d4b4be743..0d2fb071fd00 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/ibm,fsi2spi.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/ibm,fsi2spi.yaml
> @@ -24,6 +24,16 @@ properties:
> items:
> - description: FSI slave address
>
> +patternProperties:
> + "^spi(@.*|-[0-9a-f])*$":
Doesn't FSI define the unit-address format already? No need to do it
again here. Plus the form 'spi-[0-9a-f]' isn't valid. Just "^spi@"
should be enough.
> + type: object
> +
> + properties:
> + fsi2spi,restricted:
[<vendor>],<property-name>
fsi2spi is not a vendor.
> + description: indicates the controller should not use looping in the
> + sequencer and therefore has a smaller maximum transfer size
> + type: boolean
> +
> required:
> - compatible
> - reg
> --
> 2.26.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists