[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <af09a19d-3261-a1bb-4d38-e7f543648154@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 15:53:23 -0500
From: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>,
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] power: supply: bq27xxx: use BIT() for bit flags
Krzysztof
On 9/8/20 3:13 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> BIT() is a preferred way to toggle bit-like flags: no problems with 32/64
> bit systems, less chances for mistakes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> ---
> drivers/power/supply/bq27xxx_battery.c | 15 ++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/bq27xxx_battery.c b/drivers/power/supply/bq27xxx_battery.c
> index 2deac3fbb036..e971af43dd45 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/supply/bq27xxx_battery.c
> +++ b/drivers/power/supply/bq27xxx_battery.c
> @@ -847,13 +847,14 @@ static struct bq27xxx_dm_reg bq27621_dm_regs[] = {
>
> #define bq27z561_dm_regs 0
> #define bq28z610_dm_regs 0
> -
> -#define BQ27XXX_O_ZERO 0x00000001
> -#define BQ27XXX_O_OTDC 0x00000002 /* has OTC/OTD overtemperature flags */
> -#define BQ27XXX_O_UTOT 0x00000004 /* has OT overtemperature flag */
> -#define BQ27XXX_O_CFGUP 0x00000008
> -#define BQ27XXX_O_RAM 0x00000010
> -#define BQ27Z561_O_BITS 0x00000020
> +#define bq34z100_dm_regs 0
> +
> +#define BQ27XXX_O_ZERO BIT(0)
> +#define BQ27XXX_O_OTDC BIT(1) /* has OTC/OTD overtemperature flags */
> +#define BQ27XXX_O_UTOT BIT(2) /* has OT overtemperature flag */
> +#define BQ27XXX_O_CFGUP BIT(3)
> +#define BQ27XXX_O_RAM BIT(4)
> +#define BQ27Z561_O_BITS BIT(5)
>
It seems you have added whitespaces that you submitted a patch to fix in
3/7.
Also squash 3 and 4.
Dan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists