linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 4/6] dt-bindings: mfd: ene-kb3930: Add compatibles for KB930 and Acer A500

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3150618f-21db-1974-8e00-1024b6529914@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 9 Sep 2020 01:01:29 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/6] dt-bindings: mfd: ene-kb3930: Add compatibles for
 KB930 and Acer A500

09.09.2020 00:53, Rob Herring пишет:
...
>> Alright, I don't mind to separate the bindings. Although, before doing
>> that, I'd want to get opinion from the device-tree experts, i.e. from
>> Rob Herring :)
>>
>> Rob, will it be fine to have separate bindings for each firmware version
>> of the ENE controller given that firmware is individual for every device
>> and given that FW has no compatibility with other devices?
> 
> Seems like separate bindings makes sense here.

Okay, thank you for the answers and for the review of the v3!