[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a1NY07QmD+vzD3+5DsY69XYcwEz3vuwXUcsVG6jxwtTow@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 09:31:09 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
Cc: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@....com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
NXP Linux Team <Linux-imx@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 3/3] pinctrl: imx: Support building i.MX pinctrl core
driver as module
On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 9:20 AM Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com> wrote:
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> config PINCTRL_IMX
> - bool
> + tristate "IMX pinctrl core driver"
> + depends on OF
> select GENERIC_PINCTRL_GROUPS
> select GENERIC_PINMUX_FUNCTIONS
> select GENERIC_PINCONF
I don't see why you need to make this option user-visible when it is already
selected by the drivers that need it. Wouldn't it be enough to change
the 'bool' to 'tristate' without adding a prompt?
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists