[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VefU+iXpngPnzQRBfrg3OgLUBqhOCJpPo8natfCBr6Q5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 11:43:54 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 16/35] i2c: tegra: Reorder location of functions in the code
On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 5:11 AM Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Reorder location of functions in the code in order to have definition
> of functions closer to the place of the invocation. This change makes
> easier to navigate around the code and removes the need to have a
> prototype for tegra_i2c_init().
Still seems to have ordering issues (it moves pieces you actually
change in the next patches).
Have you considered which one looks neat this variant or if you move
it closer to the end of the series?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists