[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Veb5nVasy28FSksf06eVVhC8N5hHsEPM-2YcFbMjZ5Rhw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 11:47:54 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@...obroma-systems.com>,
Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>,
Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, allen <allen.chen@....com.tw>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Josua Mayer <josua.mayer@....eu>,
Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Daniel Palmer <daniel@...f.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] pwm: ntxec: Add driver for PWM function in
Netronix EC
On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 11:14 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Sep 2020, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Saturday, September 5, 2020, Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>
> > wrote:
...
> > > +config PWM_NTXEC
> > > + tristate "Netronix embedded controller PWM support"
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > + depends on MFD_NTXEC && OF
> >
> >
> > I don’t see need to reduce test coverage and use of the driver by sticking
> > with OF. Actually it’s not used.
>
> If the device is only known to boot with OF, then it's pointless
> building it when !OF.
No, it's not. As I pointed out the (compilation) test coverage is better.
> If you want to increase test coverage enable
> COMPILE_TEST instead.
It is one way to achieve that, yes;
depends on OF || COMPILE_TEST
depends on MFD_NTXEC
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists