[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vehn_19KA3DyshXd8ASWZN2CbyFdDiUHLMnB=qd7YpTaA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 11:49:36 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 25/35] i2c: tegra: Factor out error recovery from tegra_i2c_xfer_msg()
On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 5:11 AM Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Factor out error recovery code from tegra_i2c_xfer_msg() in order to
> make this function easier to read and follow.
Ordering issue.
You have a patch that replaces int -> unsigned int or so, which
obviously has less impact (severity) than this one.
Can you revisit the entire series and rethink ordering one more time?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists