[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200908114142.GR1362448@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 13:41:42 +0200
From: peterz@...radead.org
To: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Sebastian A. Siewior" <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] seqlock: Use unique prefix for seqcount_t
property accessors
On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 05:32:28PM +0200, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> static __always_inline seqcount_t * \
> -__seqcount_##lockname##_ptr(seqcount_##lockname##_t *s) \
> +__seqprop_seqcount_##lockname##_ptr(seqcount_##lockname##_t *s) \
I did s/__seqprop_seqcount_/__seqprop_/g on all this.
seqprop is a contraction of seqcount property, no need to put in yet
another seqcount I feel.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists