[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8b1db9d5-2b4c-97ae-f7f6-c750e76491d0@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 16:33:55 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 27/35] i2c: tegra: Factor out register polling into
separate function
08.09.2020 11:51, Andy Shevchenko пишет:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 5:12 AM Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> Factor out register polling into a separate function in order to remove
>> boilerplate code and make code cleaner.
>
> I'm wondering if you can make it before the patch that touches one of
> these conditionals.
>
I guess you're meaning the "Improve coding style of
tegra_i2c_wait_for_config_load()" patch.
If yes, then it should be fine to swap the order. Although, I'm not sure
what's benefit.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists