[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM6PR07MB61543BF71CE5CAE3611A7A31C5290@DM6PR07MB6154.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 13:57:55 +0000
From: Swapnil Kashinath Jakhade <sjakhade@...ence.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
CC: "kishon@...com" <kishon@...com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Milind Parab <mparab@...ence.com>,
Yuti Suresh Amonkar <yamonkar@...ence.com>,
"tomi.valkeinen@...com" <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
"jsarha@...com" <jsarha@...com>, "nsekhar@...com" <nsekhar@...com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 0/7] PHY: Prepare Cadence Torrent PHY driver to support
multilink configurations
Hi Vinod,
Thanks for the review comments.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 10:36 AM
> To: Swapnil Kashinath Jakhade <sjakhade@...ence.com>
> Cc: kishon@...com; robh+dt@...nel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> devicetree@...r.kernel.org; Milind Parab <mparab@...ence.com>; Yuti
> Suresh Amonkar <yamonkar@...ence.com>; tomi.valkeinen@...com;
> jsarha@...com; nsekhar@...com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] PHY: Prepare Cadence Torrent PHY driver to
> support multilink configurations
>
> EXTERNAL MAIL
>
>
> On 27-08-20, 15:28, Swapnil Jakhade wrote:
> > Cadence Torrent PHY is a multiprotocol PHY supporting different
> > multilink PHY configurations including DisplayPort, PCIe, USB, SGMII,
> QSGMII etc.
> > Existing Torrent PHY driver supports only DisplayPort. This patch
> > series prepares Torrent PHY driver so that different multilink
> > configurations can be supported. It also updates DT bindings
> > accordingly. This doesn't affect ABI as Torrent PHY driver has never
> > been functional, and therefore do not exist in any active use case.
> >
> > Support for different multilink configurations with register sequences
> > for protocols above will be added in a separate patch series.
>
> Series looks good to me.
>
> > This patch series is dependent on PHY attributes patch series [1].
>
> I did not see any obvious depends in the series, if it is not maybe good to
> rebase and send without dependency
>
Sure. I will resend the series removing dependency.
Thanks & regards,
Swapnil
> --
> ~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists