linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 8 Sep 2020 15:20:23 +0200
From:   Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Guru Das Srinagesh <gurus@...eaurora.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with Linus' tree

Hi,

On 9/8/20 1:04 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Hans,
> 
> On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 10:22:06 +0200 Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 9/8/20 6:00 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>
>>> Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel tree got a conflict in:
>>>
>>>     drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c
>>>
>>> between commit:
>>>
>>>     f8bd54d21904 ("drm/i915: panel: Use atomic PWM API for devs with an external PWM controller")
> 
> This should have been
> 
>    899c537c25f9 ("drm/i915: Use 64-bit division macro")

Yes that makes more sense.

>>> from Linus' tree and commit:
>>>
>>>     6b51e7d23aa8 ("drm/i915: panel: Honor the VBT PWM frequency for devs with an external PWM controller")
>>
>> That doesn't sound correct, those are both commits from the drm-intel tree.
>>
>>> from the drm-intel tree.
>>>
>>> I fixed it up (I just used the latter)
>>
>> Just taking the drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c contents of:
>>
>> f8bd54d21904 ("drm/i915: panel: Use atomic PWM API for devs with an external PWM controller")
>>
>> Is the right thing to do, the problem is a difference in a line which gets
>> removed in that commit.
> 
> Which is what I actually did, I guess :-)

Yes, looks good.

> Sorry about that.

No problem and thank you for all the work you do on -next.

Regards,

Hans