lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 08 Sep 2020 18:21:13 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Masahisa Kojima <masahisa.kojima@...aro.org>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>,
        linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
        Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
        Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>,
        Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] spi: sprd: Release DMA channel also on probe deferral

On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 17:27:03 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> If dma_request_chan() for TX channel fails with EPROBE_DEFER, the RX
> channel would not be released and on next re-probe it would be requested
> second time.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[01/11] spi: sprd: Release DMA channel also on probe deferral
        commit: 687a2e76186dcfa42f22c14b655c3fb159839e79
[02/11] spi: sprd: Simplify with dev_err_probe()
        (no commit info)
[03/11] spi: atmel: Simplify with dev_err_probe()
        commit: 96189475820835d7176171492640a58c600aca42
[04/11] spi: bcm2835: Simplify with dev_err_probe()
        commit: 65acd82c4eb7f08747922ed3afb2d099a1b25d3f
[05/11] spi: cadence-quadspi: Simplify with dev_err_probe()
        commit: 436a5c208037a71f64f35312969e27a05d6d7c53
[06/11] spi: spi-mux: Simplify with dev_err_probe()
        commit: 2d9bdf645584d15ed1d4aae6204cb6ea8b673d48
[07/11] spi: qcom-qspi: Simplify with dev_err_probe()
        commit: 034532681c56cfffaea169a59155fe11e9172d9c
[08/11] spi: stm32: Simplify with dev_err_probe()
        commit: a05cec2dc2df1e5d25addb7aba398f3eb451e163
[09/11] spi: synquacer: Simplify with dev_err_probe()
        commit: 74ee6dc1257edf5fcfba67fd8075b766d11c42a0
[10/11] spi: tegra114: Simplify with dev_err_probe()
        commit: 68fffc191ed19ea5618285b128e6048d1536e680
[11/11] spi: tegra20: Simplify with dev_err_probe()
        commit: 7708aff1e2ebc8fdccdd61cf9ab8576a66989166

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ