linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.4 031/129] mmc: sdhci-acpi: Fix HS400 tuning for AMDI0040

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200908173542.GA220950@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 8 Sep 2020 19:35:42 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Raul Rangel <rrangel@...omium.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 031/129] mmc: sdhci-acpi: Fix HS400 tuning for
 AMDI0040

On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 09:56:43AM -0600, Raul Rangel wrote:
> So this patch had a bug in it. It was fixed with
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11747031/
> Commit d9fcc7130245d79a75e3f0348d3ef7297055cfd4 from
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ulfh/mmc.git
> 
> Should we pull that in too, or is it fine to wait for the next merge?

It depends on wha tyou want to do.  I can drop this now and add both
later, or just be "bug compatible" with Linus's tree until this patch
gets merged into it, and then I can take it.

Your call...

thanks,

greg k-h