[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 17:27:51 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, paulmck@...nel.org,
joel@...lfernandes.org, josh@...htriplett.org,
peterz@...radead.org, christian.brauner@...ntu.com,
rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sfr@...b.auug.org.au, roopa@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] rcu: prevent RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN() from
swallowing the condition
On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 21:15:56 +0300 nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com wrote:
> Ah, you want to solve it for all. :)
> Looks and sounds good to me,
> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
Actually, I give up, lockdep_is_held() is not defined without
CONFIG_LOCKDEP, let's just go with your patch..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists