linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 00/20] gpio: cdev: add uAPI v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 9 Sep 2020 09:52:02 +0200
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
To:     Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-gpio <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/20] gpio: cdev: add uAPI v2

On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 3:16 AM Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 06:07:49PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 3:36 PM Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> [ snip]
>
> > >
> > >  drivers/gpio/Kconfig        |   29 +-
> > >  drivers/gpio/Makefile       |    2 +-
> > >  drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c | 1277 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > >  drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.h |   15 +
> > >  drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c      |    5 +
> > >  drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h      |    6 +
> > >  include/uapi/linux/gpio.h   |  317 ++++++++-
> > >  tools/gpio/gpio-event-mon.c |  146 ++--
> > >  tools/gpio/gpio-hammer.c    |   56 +-
> > >  tools/gpio/gpio-utils.c     |  176 ++++-
> > >  tools/gpio/gpio-utils.h     |   48 +-
> > >  tools/gpio/gpio-watch.c     |   16 +-
> > >  tools/gpio/lsgpio.c         |   60 +-
> > >  13 files changed, 1948 insertions(+), 205 deletions(-)
> > >
> > >
> > > base-commit: feeaefd378cae2f6840f879d6123ef265f8aee79
> > > --
> > > 2.28.0
> > >
> >
> > To me this looks good enough to queue for v5.10. I think you'll need
> > to resend the selftests patches and get an ack from selftests
> > maintainer. Once that's done we can get this series into next.
> >
>
> I can hardly resend what has never been sent ;-).
>
> This series is complete without the selftest changes.  Once this is in tree
> somewhere, so I have something to base them on, I'll bounce them off
> Shuah.
>

Oops, sorry I got confused by Shuah's mail.

Bartosz