linux-kernel - RE: [EXT] [PATCH 0/5 REBASED to v5.9-rc4] Qlogic drivers: Convert to SPDX license identifiers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 9 Sep 2020 09:03:08 +0000
From:   Nilesh Javali <njavali@...vell.com>
To:     Igor Russkikh <irusskikh@...vell.com>,
        Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "linux-spdx@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spdx@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [EXT] [PATCH 0/5 REBASED to v5.9-rc4] Qlogic drivers: Convert to
 SPDX license identifiers

Lukas,

I have Acked for the storage drivers and opt for option B below for spdx maintainers to pick.

Thanks,
Nilesh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Igor Russkikh <irusskikh@...vell.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 1:25 PM
> To: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>; Thomas Gleixner
> <tglx@...utronix.de>; linux-spdx@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Nilesh Javali <njavali@...vell.com>
> Subject: Re: [EXT] [PATCH 0/5 REBASED to v5.9-rc4] Qlogic drivers: Convert to
> SPDX license identifiers
> 
> 
> 
> > Igor, can you please ack these patches?
> >
> > Igor, please also let us know:
> >   A. if you will pick them up and let them travel through your tree, or
> >   B. if the spdx maintainers shall pick them up and they shall route them
> >      directly to Linus.
> 
> Thanks Lukas,
> 
> Acked on ethernet driver patches. For storage drivers I believe you'll have
> ACK from Nilesh.
> 
> We don't manage our own tree, we normally do directly on netdev list.
> Thus I think its safe to go with (B) and do this through spdx tree.
> 
> Regards,
>   Igor