[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 11:27:25 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Alexander Dahl <ada@...rsis.com>
Cc: linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
Alexander Dahl <post@...pocky.de>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] leds: pwm: Make automatic labels work
Hi!
> > > Besides: those suggestions are obviously valid for new bindings. What
> > > about old bindings (.txt), which had no explicit SPDX tag or license note
> > > before? What license would apply there? Is the .yaml file technically
> > > new, when it was mostly just converted from .txt?
> >
> > If it is based on previous .txt binding, you have to respect previous
> > author's license. That probably means GPL-2.0 only.
>
> Probably?
I have not checked exact licensing situation of that text, have not
decided if it was copyrightable in the first place, and am not a
lawyer.
So... probably :-).
Best regards,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists