[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 13:56:34 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rajmohan Mani <rajmohan.mani@...el.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>,
Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@...el.com>,
Chiranjeevi Rapolu <chiranjeevi.rapolu@...el.com>,
Hyungwoo Yang <hyungwoo.yang@...el.com>,
linux-media <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 6/6] at24: Support probing while off
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 1:11 PM Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de> wrote:
>
>
> > This currently conflicts with the fix I queued for at24 for v5.9.
> > Which tree is going to take this series?
>
> I recall we agreed on I2C.
>
Sakari,
can you rebase the at24 driver patch on top of Wolfram's tree as soon
as he merges my PR with at24 fixes?
Bartosz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists