linux-kernel - [tip: locking/core] timekeeping: Use seqcount_latch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <159975050740.20229.1073373223572014594.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date:   Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:08:27 -0000
From:   "tip-bot2 for Ahmed S. Darwish" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@...utronix.de>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        x86 <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [tip: locking/core] timekeeping: Use seqcount_latch_t

The following commit has been merged into the locking/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     249d053835320cb3e7c00066cf085a6ba9b1f126
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/249d053835320cb3e7c00066cf085a6ba9b1f126
Author:        Ahmed S. Darwish <a.darwish@...utronix.de>
AuthorDate:    Thu, 27 Aug 2020 13:40:41 +02:00
Committer:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CommitterDate: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 11:19:29 +02:00

timekeeping: Use seqcount_latch_t

Latch sequence counters are a multiversion concurrency control mechanism
where the seqcount_t counter even/odd value is used to switch between
two data storage copies. This allows the seqcount_t read path to safely
interrupt its write side critical section (e.g. from NMIs).

Initially, latch sequence counters were implemented as a single write
function, raw_write_seqcount_latch(), above plain seqcount_t. The read
path was expected to use plain seqcount_t raw_read_seqcount().

A specialized read function was later added, raw_read_seqcount_latch(),
and became the standardized way for latch read paths. Having unique read
and write APIs meant that latch sequence counters are basically a data
type of their own -- just inappropriately overloading plain seqcount_t.
The seqcount_latch_t data type was thus introduced at seqlock.h.

Use that new data type instead of seqcount_raw_spinlock_t. This ensures
that only latch-safe APIs are to be used with the sequence counter.

Note that the use of seqcount_raw_spinlock_t was not very useful in the
first place. Only the "raw_" subset of seqcount_t APIs were used at
timekeeping.c. This subset was created for contexts where lockdep cannot
be used. seqcount_LOCKTYPE_t's raison d'être -- verifying that the
seqcount_t writer serialization lock is held -- cannot thus be done.

References: 0c3351d451ae ("seqlock: Use raw_ prefix instead of _no_lockdep")
References: 55f3560df975 ("seqlock: Extend seqcount API with associated locks")
Signed-off-by: Ahmed S. Darwish <a.darwish@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200827114044.11173-6-a.darwish@linutronix.de
---
 kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index 4c47f38..999c981 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static struct timekeeper shadow_timekeeper;
  * See @update_fast_timekeeper() below.
  */
 struct tk_fast {
-	seqcount_raw_spinlock_t	seq;
+	seqcount_latch_t	seq;
 	struct tk_read_base	base[2];
 };

@@ -81,13 +81,13 @@ static struct clocksource dummy_clock = {
 };

 static struct tk_fast tk_fast_mono ____cacheline_aligned = {
-	.seq     = SEQCNT_RAW_SPINLOCK_ZERO(tk_fast_mono.seq, &timekeeper_lock),
+	.seq     = SEQCNT_LATCH_ZERO(tk_fast_mono.seq),
 	.base[0] = { .clock = &dummy_clock, },
 	.base[1] = { .clock = &dummy_clock, },
 };

 static struct tk_fast tk_fast_raw  ____cacheline_aligned = {
-	.seq     = SEQCNT_RAW_SPINLOCK_ZERO(tk_fast_raw.seq, &timekeeper_lock),
+	.seq     = SEQCNT_LATCH_ZERO(tk_fast_raw.seq),
 	.base[0] = { .clock = &dummy_clock, },
 	.base[1] = { .clock = &dummy_clock, },
 };
@@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ static __always_inline u64 __ktime_get_fast_ns(struct tk_fast *tkf)
 					tk_clock_read(tkr),
 					tkr->cycle_last,
 					tkr->mask));
-	} while (read_seqcount_retry(&tkf->seq, seq));
+	} while (read_seqcount_latch_retry(&tkf->seq, seq));

 	return now;
 }
@@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ static __always_inline u64 __ktime_get_real_fast_ns(struct tk_fast *tkf)
 					tk_clock_read(tkr),
 					tkr->cycle_last,
 					tkr->mask));
-	} while (read_seqcount_retry(&tkf->seq, seq));
+	} while (read_seqcount_latch_retry(&tkf->seq, seq));

 	return now;
 }