[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f14f7f00-0501-bb93-88cc-780ae4fbaad3@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:00:30 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jan Höppner <hoeppner@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Ways to deprecate /sys/devices/system/memory/memoryX/phys_device
?
On 9/10/20 3:20 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> I was just exploring how /sys/devices/system/memory/memoryX/phys_device
> is/was used. It's one of these interfaces that most probably never
> should have been added but now we are stuck with it.
While I'm all for cleanups, what specific problems is phys_device causing?
Are you hoping that we can just remove users of memoryX/* until there
are no more left, and this is the easiest place to start?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists