[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpX0_mz+McZdzZ7HFTjBihOKz5E6i4qJQSoFbZ=SZkVh=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:07:16 -0700
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linuxarm@...wei.com,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] net: sch_generic: aviod concurrent reset and
enqueue op for lockless qdisc
On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 4:06 AM Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> Currently there is concurrent reset and enqueue operation for the
> same lockless qdisc when there is no lock to synchronize the
> q->enqueue() in __dev_xmit_skb() with the qdisc reset operation in
> qdisc_deactivate() called by dev_deactivate_queue(), which may cause
> out-of-bounds access for priv->ring[] in hns3 driver if user has
> requested a smaller queue num when __dev_xmit_skb() still enqueue a
> skb with a larger queue_mapping after the corresponding qdisc is
> reset, and call hns3_nic_net_xmit() with that skb later.
>
> Reused the existing synchronize_net() in dev_deactivate_many() to
> make sure skb with larger queue_mapping enqueued to old qdisc(which
> is saved in dev_queue->qdisc_sleeping) will always be reset when
> dev_reset_queue() is called.
>
> Fixes: 6b3ba9146fe6 ("net: sched: allow qdiscs to handle locking")
> Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
> ---
> ChangeLog V2:
> Reuse existing synchronize_net().
> ---
> net/sched/sch_generic.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sched/sch_generic.c b/net/sched/sch_generic.c
> index 265a61d..54c4172 100644
> --- a/net/sched/sch_generic.c
> +++ b/net/sched/sch_generic.c
> @@ -1131,24 +1131,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(dev_activate);
>
> static void qdisc_deactivate(struct Qdisc *qdisc)
> {
> - bool nolock = qdisc->flags & TCQ_F_NOLOCK;
> -
> if (qdisc->flags & TCQ_F_BUILTIN)
> return;
> - if (test_bit(__QDISC_STATE_DEACTIVATED, &qdisc->state))
> - return;
> -
> - if (nolock)
> - spin_lock_bh(&qdisc->seqlock);
> - spin_lock_bh(qdisc_lock(qdisc));
>
> set_bit(__QDISC_STATE_DEACTIVATED, &qdisc->state);
> -
> - qdisc_reset(qdisc);
> -
> - spin_unlock_bh(qdisc_lock(qdisc));
> - if (nolock)
> - spin_unlock_bh(&qdisc->seqlock);
> }
>
> static void dev_deactivate_queue(struct net_device *dev,
> @@ -1165,6 +1151,30 @@ static void dev_deactivate_queue(struct net_device *dev,
> }
> }
>
> +static void dev_reset_queue(struct net_device *dev,
> + struct netdev_queue *dev_queue,
> + void *_unused)
> +{
> + struct Qdisc *qdisc;
> + bool nolock;
> +
> + qdisc = dev_queue->qdisc_sleeping;
> + if (!qdisc)
> + return;
> +
> + nolock = qdisc->flags & TCQ_F_NOLOCK;
> +
> + if (nolock)
> + spin_lock_bh(&qdisc->seqlock);
> + spin_lock_bh(qdisc_lock(qdisc));
I think you do not need this lock for lockless one.
> +
> + qdisc_reset(qdisc);
> +
> + spin_unlock_bh(qdisc_lock(qdisc));
> + if (nolock)
> + spin_unlock_bh(&qdisc->seqlock);
> +}
> +
> static bool some_qdisc_is_busy(struct net_device *dev)
> {
> unsigned int i;
> @@ -1213,12 +1223,20 @@ void dev_deactivate_many(struct list_head *head)
> dev_watchdog_down(dev);
> }
>
> - /* Wait for outstanding qdisc-less dev_queue_xmit calls.
> + /* Wait for outstanding qdisc-less dev_queue_xmit calls or
> + * outstanding qdisc enqueuing calls.
> * This is avoided if all devices are in dismantle phase :
> * Caller will call synchronize_net() for us
> */
> synchronize_net();
>
> + list_for_each_entry(dev, head, close_list) {
> + netdev_for_each_tx_queue(dev, dev_reset_queue, NULL);
> +
> + if (dev_ingress_queue(dev))
> + dev_reset_queue(dev, dev_ingress_queue(dev), NULL);
> + }
> +
> /* Wait for outstanding qdisc_run calls. */
> list_for_each_entry(dev, head, close_list) {
> while (some_qdisc_is_busy(dev)) {
Do you want to reset before waiting for TX action?
I think it is safer to do it after, at least prior to commit 759ae57f1b
we did after.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists