[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200910221116.GQ87483@ziepe.ca>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 19:11:16 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
linux-x86 <x86@...nel.org>,
linux-arm <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-power <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
linux-sparc <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-um <linux-um@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] mm/gup: fix gup_fast with dynamic page table
folding
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 02:22:37PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
> Or am I way off here, and it really is possible (aside from the current
> s390 situation) to observe something that "is no longer a page table"?
Yes, that is the issue. Remember there is no locking for GUP
fast. While a page table cannot be freed there is nothing preventing
the page table entry from being concurrently modified.
Without the stack variable it looks like this:
pud_t pud = READ_ONCE(*pudp);
if (!pud_present(pud))
return
pmd_offset(pudp, address);
And pmd_offset() expands to
return (pmd_t *)pud_page_vaddr(*pud) + pmd_index(address);
Between the READ_ONCE(*pudp) and (*pud) inside pmd_offset() the value
of *pud can change, eg to !pud_present.
Then pud_page_vaddr(*pud) will crash. It is not use after free, it
is using data that has not been validated.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists