linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7] cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Add support for Mediatek cpufreq HW driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200910053406.t37rgioykzvk3oem@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Thu, 10 Sep 2020 11:04:06 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Hector Yuan <hector.yuan@...iatek.com>
Cc:     linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        wsd_upstream@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Add support for Mediatek
 cpufreq HW driver

On 10-09-20, 13:30, Hector Yuan wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 10:33 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 10-09-20, 12:31, Hector Yuan wrote:
> > > The CPUfreq HW present in some Mediatek chipsets offloads the steps necessary for changing the frequency of CPUs. 
> > > The driver implements the cpufreq driver interface for this hardware engine. 
> > > 
> > > This patch depends on the MT6779 DTS patch submitted by Hanks Chen
> > >  https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/4/1094
> > 
> > Thanks for hanging there. Looks good to me. I will apply it once Rob
> > Ack's the binding patch.
> > 
> 
> Many thanks for your help. May I know if you can add Reviewed-by tag to
> this patch set.

Since this patchset is going to get merged via my tree (ARM cpufreq
tree), a reviewed-by isn't required here. I will queue it up for
5.10-rc1 after I receive an Ack from Rob.

> I would like to prepare some patches for more features
> based on this. Is that okay to you? Thanks again.

That should be fine.

-- 
viresh