[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bbb50d5f-869d-3a18-e568-ba541c9a2569@siemens.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 08:09:07 +0200
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Awan, Arsalan" <Arsalan_Awan@...tor.com>,
"Hombourger, Cedric" <Cedric_Hombourger@...tor.com>,
"Farnsworth, Wade" <wade_farnsworth@...tor.com>
Subject: Re: watchdog: sp5100_tco support for AMD V/R/E series
On 09.09.20 18:04, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 9/7/20 1:45 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 9/7/20 12:18 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> On 9/7/20 8:46 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> On 07.09.20 17:31, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>>> On 9/7/20 4:20 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Arsalan reported that the upstream driver for sp5100_tco does not work
>>>>>> for embedded Ryzen. Meanwhile, I was able to confirm that on an R1505G:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ 11.607251] sp5100_tco: SP5100/SB800 TCO WatchDog Timer Driver
>>>>>> [ 11.607337] sp5100-tco sp5100-tco: Using 0xfed80b00 for watchdog MMIO address
>>>>>> [ 11.607344] sp5100-tco sp5100-tco: Watchdog hardware is disabled
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ..and fix it:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/sp5100_tco.c b/drivers/watchdog/sp5100_tco.c
>>>>>> index 85e9664318c9..5482154fde42 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/sp5100_tco.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/sp5100_tco.c
>>>>>> @@ -193,7 +193,8 @@ static void tco_timer_enable(struct sp5100_tco *tco)
>>>>>> /* Set the Watchdog timer resolution to 1 sec and enable */
>>>>>> sp5100_tco_update_pm_reg8(EFCH_PM_DECODEEN3,
>>>>>> ~EFCH_PM_WATCHDOG_DISABLE,
>>>>>> - EFCH_PM_DECODEEN_SECOND_RES);
>>>>>> + EFCH_PM_DECODEEN_SECOND_RES |
>>>>>> + EFCH_PM_DECODEEN_WDT_TMREN);
>>>>>
>>>>> Confusing. The register in question is a 32-bit register, but only a byte
>>>>> is written into it. Bit 24-25 are supposed to be the resolution, bit 25-26
>>>>> set to 0 enable the watchdog. Bit 7 is supposed to enable MMIO decoding.
>>>>> This is from AMD Publication 52740. So something in the existing code
>>>>> is (or seems to be) wrong, but either case I don't see how setting bit 7
>>>>> (or 31 ?) would enable the watchdog hardware.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmm, I wrote that code. Guess I'll need to to spend some time figuring out
>>>>> what is going on.
>>>>
>>>> The logic came from [1] which inspired [2] - that's where I pointed out
>>>> the large overlap with the existing upstream driver. I would love to see
>>>> all that consolidated.
>>>>
>>>> BTW, the R1505G is family 0x17. Maybe something changed there, and that
>>>> bit 7 was just reserved/ignored so far. ENOSPECS
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for the pointers.
>>>
>>> I think you are talking about bit 31. Bit 7 is and was WatchdogTmrEn, but that
>>> supposedly only enables watchdog timer memory access at 0xfeb00000. From what
>>> I glance from the other drivers, the existing code is wrong. It should set
>>> the disable and resolution bits in register offset 3 (bit 24..27), not 0.
>>> In other words, EFCH_PM_DECODEEN3 should be defined as 0x03, not as 0x00.
>>> Which actually makes sense from the name.
>>>
>>> Playing with my hardware, turns out that setting bit 7 in EFCH_PM_DECODEEN
>>> (register offset 0) does indeed enable the watchdog. I'll need to check
>>> if it actually works. Either case, -ENOSPECS is really a problem here.
>>>
>>
>> ... and it does work. After playing with it, it seems that on Family 17h
>> CPUs EFCH_PM_DECODEEN_WDT_TMREN not only enables watchdog timer memory
>> access at 0xfeb0000, but also enables the watchdog itself.
>>
>> Also, turns out the documentation is now public, at least for some of the
>> Family 17h CPUs (though oddly enough not for all of them). See processor
>> reference manuals at https://www.amd.com/en/support/tech-docs. The documents
>> for model 18h and model 20h include a note stating that bit 7 of
>> EFCH_PM_DECODEEN enables both memory access and the watchdog hardware.
>>
>> So we'll need two patches - one to fix the value of EFCH_PM_DECODEEN3,
>> and one to enable the watchdog bit setting bit 7 of EFCH_PM_DECODEEN
>> for Family 17h CPUs.
>>
> Jan - any chance you can submit those patches ? Or do you want me to do it ?
Oh, I was reading your reply as if you were writing the patches. The
first one is definitely your finding, and while I can also see now what
is wrong and needed on 17h, I'm unsure about the rest. If you have a
better picture, please go ahead.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA IOT SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
Powered by blists - more mailing lists