[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87mu1yk1j1.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 08:50:42 +1000
From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Cc: milan.opensource@...il.com, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fsync.2: ERRORS: add EIO and ENOSPC
On Tue, Sep 08 2020, Jeff Layton wrote:
>
> Yep.
>
> My only comment is that there is nothing special about EIO and ENOSPC.
There are two type of errors that fsync can return.
EBADF EROFS EINVAL - these are usage errors.
EIO ENOSPC EDQUOT - these are functional failures.
So I would say there *is* something special about those errors, though
it isn't *very* special, and it isn't *just* those errors. EDQUOT should
be included in the list.
NeilBrown
> All errors are the same in this regard. Basically, issuing a new fsync
> after a failed one doesn't do any good. You need to redirty the pages
> first.
> --
> Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (854 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists