[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200910083459.GB2285@linux>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:34:59 +0200
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/5] mm, page_alloc: clean up pageset high and batch update
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 10:31:20AM +0200, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 06:36:24PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
>
> > for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> > - setup_pageset(&per_cpu(boot_pageset, cpu), 0);
> > + setup_pageset(&per_cpu(boot_pageset, cpu));
>
> This is not really anything important but I realized we have like 7 functions
> messing with pcp lists, and everytime I try to follow them my head spins.
>
> Since setup_pageset is only being called here, could we replace it by the
> pageset_init and pageset_update?
>
> (As I said, not important and probably a matter of taste. I just think that
> having so many mini functions around is not always cool,
> e.g: setup_zone_pageset->zone_pageset_init)
Sorry, I did not see that you just did that in Patch#3, bleh.
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists