lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 18:12:04 +0800 From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com> To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/3] x86/entry: simply stack switching when exception on userspace > There are definitely good cleanups in here, but I think it would be > nice rebased to whatever lands in 5.8-rc1 settles. Hello, tglx, Andy: Could you have a review on the patches please? They are based on 5.9-rc1 and sent when 5.9-rc1 was just settled, and hoped to get their way into 5.10-rc1. The first two patches can still be applied to today's tip/master, (Sep 10 2020). The third can't, and conflicts with a commit just added 3 days ago(#VC related). But the third removes a short snip of code only, and is easy to be reviewed or even easy to be applied manually. I will rebase all of them after they or the first two are reviewed. I'm sorry that I have to ask you to review again, because the patches change the code you've recently changed. Thanks Lai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists