lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 10 Sep 2020 18:21:04 +0800
From:   Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
To:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] kvm x86/mmu: use KVM_REQ_MMU_SYNC to sync when needed

Hi, Paolo

Could you pick the patch please?

I think it'd be better to be merged before v5.9 is released
since it fixes a flaw.

Thanks
Lai

On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 11:22 PM Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com> wrote:
>
> From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>
>
> When kvm_mmu_get_page() gets a page with unsynced children, the spt
> pagetable is unsynchronized with the guest pagetable. But the
> guest might not issue a "flush" operation on it when the pagetable
> entry is changed from zero or other cases. The hypervisor has the
> responsibility to synchronize the pagetables.
>
> The linux kernel behaves correctly as above for many years, but a recent
> commit 8c8560b83390 ("KVM: x86/mmu: Use KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH_CURRENT for
> MMU specific flushes") inadvertently included a line of code to change it
> without giving any reason in the changelog. It is clear that the commit's
> intention was to change KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH -> KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH_CURRENT,
> so we don't unneedlesly flush other contexts but one of the hunks changed
> nearby KVM_REQ_MMU_SYNC instead.
>
> This patch changes it back.
>
> Fixes: 8c8560b83390("KVM: x86/mmu: Use KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH_CURRENT for MMU specific flushes)
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200320212833.3507-26-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com/
> Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> Changed from v1:
>         update patch description
>
> Changed form v2:
>         update patch description
>
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index 4e03841f053d..9a93de921f2b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -2468,7 +2468,7 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_get_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>                 }
>
>                 if (sp->unsync_children)
> -                       kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH_CURRENT, vcpu);
> +                       kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_MMU_SYNC, vcpu);
>
>                 __clear_sp_write_flooding_count(sp);
>
> --
> 2.19.1.6.gb485710b
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ