[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200910111547.wkayyfmcf3crvcmh@e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:15:49 +0100
From: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, cai@....pw,
mingo@...nel.org, ethp@...com, tyhicks@...onical.com,
arnd@...db.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: Use scnprintf() in show_smt_*() instead of
snprintf()
On 09/01/20 17:49, Shuah Khan wrote:
> Since snprintf() returns would-be-output size instead of the actual
> output size, replace it with scnprintf(), so the show_smt_control(),
> and show_smt_active() routines return the actual size.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Looks good to me.
Cheers
--
Qais Yousef
> ---
> kernel/cpu.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
> index 6ff2578ecf17..29a5ceb93cda 100644
> --- a/kernel/cpu.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpu.c
> @@ -2334,7 +2334,7 @@ show_smt_control(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> {
> const char *state = smt_states[cpu_smt_control];
>
> - return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE - 2, "%s\n", state);
> + return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE - 2, "%s\n", state);
> }
>
> static ssize_t
> @@ -2348,7 +2348,7 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR(control, 0644, show_smt_control, store_smt_control);
> static ssize_t
> show_smt_active(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> {
> - return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE - 2, "%d\n", sched_smt_active());
> + return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE - 2, "%d\n", sched_smt_active());
> }
> static DEVICE_ATTR(active, 0444, show_smt_active, NULL);
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists