[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200911060925.GA553486@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:09:25 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Hector Martin <hector@...cansoft.com>
Cc: James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@...il.com>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Lars Melin <larsm17@...il.com>,
Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Russ Dill <Russ.Dill@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: serial: Repair FTDI FT232R bricked eeprom
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 04:54:08AM +0900, Hector Martin wrote:
> On 11/09/2020 03.51, James Hilliard wrote:
> > I haven't tested this yet but my assumption was that either a kernel driver
> > or libusb can issue usb control messages, but both can not be bound to
> > a device at the same time. I figured this wouldn't have come up when you
> > tested your python script since the script likely predated adding the brick PID
> > to the ftdi_sio Linux kernel driver.
>
> Binding to interfaces is exclusive, but global device control messages are
> not issued to an interface. I think it should work even if the kernel driver
> is bound (this is how lsusb works too, since it issues control requests even
> to devices bound to drivers). Even if it is necessary to unbind it, though,
> libusb already provides a single function to do that
> (libusb_detach_kernel_driver).
You really should unbind the device from the driver when doing stuff
like this, so the kernel doesn't get confused.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists