lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200911062134.GB21597@lst.de>
Date:   Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:21:34 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux390-list@...maker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com, hch@....de,
        borntraeger@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/zcrypt: remove set_fs() invocation in zcrypt
 device driver

On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 12:28:38PM +0200, Harald Freudenberger wrote:
> +static inline unsigned long z_copy_from_user(bool userspace,
> +					     void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n)

Can you avoid the pointless long lines in the function declaration?

> +{
> +	if (likely(userspace))
> +		return copy_from_user(to, from, n);
> +	memcpy(to, (void __force *) from, n);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline unsigned long z_copy_to_user(bool userspace,
> +					   void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n)
> +{
> +	if (likely(userspace))
> +		return copy_to_user(to, from, n);
> +	memcpy((void __force *) to, from, n);
> +	return 0;

Otherwise this doesn't look great, but also not horrible and gets rid
of the set_fs while reducing the lines of code, so:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ