linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: PCI: fix memleak when calling pci

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 11 Sep 2020 10:51:47 +0100
From:   Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc:     George Cherian <gcherian@...vell.com>,
        Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>,
        "bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        "guohanjun@...wei.com" <guohanjun@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: PCI: fix memleak when calling pci_iomap/unmap()

On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 02:54:01PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 12:36:13PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 12:21:19PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 10:51:21AM +0000, George Cherian wrote:
> > > > Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com> wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 10:48:11AM +0800, Yang Yingliang wrote:
> > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c index
> > > > > > 1006ed2d7c604..ddfa1c53def48 100644
> > > > > > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> > > > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> > > > > > @@ -217,4 +217,9 @@ void pcibios_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
> > > > > >  	acpi_pci_remove_bus(bus);
> > > > > >  }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +void pci_iounmap(struct pci_dev *dev, void __iomem *addr) {
> > > > > > +	iounmap(addr);
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_iounmap);
> > > > > 
> > > > > So, what's wrong with the generic pci_iounmap() implementation?
> > > > > Shouldn't it call iounmap() already?
> > > > 
> > > > Since ARM64 selects CONFIG_GENERIC_PCI_IOMAP and not
> > > > CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP,  the pci_iounmap function is reduced to a NULL
> > > > function. Due to this, even the managed release variants or even the explicit
> > > > pci_iounmap calls doesn't really remove the mappings leading to leak.
> > > 
> > > Ah, I missed the fact that pci_iounmap() depends on a different
> > > config option.
> > > 
> > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/20/28
> > > 
> > > So is this going to be fixed in the generic code? That would be my
> > > preference.
> > > 
> > > A problem with the iounmap() in the proposed patch is that the region
> > > may have been an I/O port, so we could end up unmapping the I/O space.
> > 
> > It boils down to finding a way to match a VA to a BAR resource so that
> > we can mirror on pci_iounmap() what's done in pci_iomap_range() (ie
> > check BAR resource flags to define how/if to unmap them), that would do
> > as a generic pci_iounmap() implementation.
> 
> In the !CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP case (arm64), for IORESOURCE_IO,
> pci_iomap_range() calls __pci_ioport_map() which, with the default
> ioport_map(), it ends up with a simple PCI_IOBASE + (port &
> IO_SPACE_LIMIT).
> 
> pci_iounmap() could check whether the pointer is in the PCI_IOBASE -
> PCI_IOBASE+IO_SPACE_LIMIT range before calling ioremap(), unless the
> arch code re-defined ioport_map. Something like below (not even
> compiled):

For everyone's information, I shall post a fix when I manage to
make the kbuild bot happy on all arches.

Lorenzo

> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/io.h b/include/asm-generic/io.h
> index dabf8cb7203b..fada420c9cd6 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/io.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/io.h
> @@ -919,6 +919,11 @@ extern void __iomem *pci_iomap(struct pci_dev *dev, int bar, unsigned long max);
>  #define pci_iounmap pci_iounmap
>  static inline void pci_iounmap(struct pci_dev *dev, void __iomem *p)
>  {
> +#ifndef ARCH_HAS_IOPORT_MAP
> +	if (p >= PCI_IOBASE && p < PCI_IOBASE + IO_SPACE_LIMIT)
> +		return;
> +	iounmap(p);
> +#endif
>  }
>  #endif
>  #endif /* CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP */
> @@ -1009,7 +1014,9 @@ static inline void __iomem *ioremap_uc(phys_addr_t offset, size_t size)
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT_MAP
>  #ifndef CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP
> -#ifndef ioport_map
> +#ifdef ioport_map
> +#define ARCH_HAS_IOPORT_MAP
> +#else
>  #define ioport_map ioport_map
>  static inline void __iomem *ioport_map(unsigned long port, unsigned int nr)
>  {
> 
> -- 
> Catalin