| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20200911101132.GC165568@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:11:32 +0200
From: peterz@...radead.org
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>, cristian.marussi@....com,
sudeep.holla@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] cpufreq: stats: Defer stats update to
cpufreq_stats_record_transition()
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 12:54:41PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> + atomic_t reset_pending;
> + atomic_set(&stats->reset_pending, 0);
> + if (atomic_read(&stats->reset_pending))
> + bool pending = atomic_read(&stats->reset_pending);
> + atomic_set(&stats->reset_pending, 1);
> + bool pending = atomic_read(&stats->reset_pending);
> + if (atomic_read(&stats->reset_pending))
What do you think atomic_t is doing for you?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists