[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87o8mclei1.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 13:49:42 +0200
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"maintainer\:X86 ARCHITECTURE" <x86@...nel.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] KVM: SVM: nested: fix free of uninitialized pointers save and ctl
Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com> writes:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> Currently the error exit path to outt_set_gif will kfree on
> uninitialized
typo: out_set_gif
> pointers save and ctl. Fix this by ensuring these pointers are
> inintialized to NULL to avoid garbage pointer freeing.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Uninitialized pointer read")
> Fixes: 6ccbd29ade0d ("KVM: SVM: nested: Don't allocate VMCB structures
> on stack")
Where is this commit id from? I don't see it in Paolo's kvm tree, if
it's not yet merged, maybe we should fix it and avoid introducing the
issue in the first place?
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
> index 28036629abf8..2b15f49f9e5a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
> @@ -1060,8 +1060,8 @@ static int svm_set_nested_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> struct vmcb *hsave = svm->nested.hsave;
> struct vmcb __user *user_vmcb = (struct vmcb __user *)
> &user_kvm_nested_state->data.svm[0];
> - struct vmcb_control_area *ctl;
> - struct vmcb_save_area *save;
> + struct vmcb_control_area *ctl = NULL;
> + struct vmcb_save_area *save = NULL;
> int ret;
> u32 cr0;
I think it would be better if we eliminate 'out_set_gif; completely as
the 'error path' we have looks a bit weird anyway. Something like
(untested):
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
index 28036629abf8..d1ae94f40907 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
@@ -1092,7 +1092,8 @@ static int svm_set_nested_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
if (!(kvm_state->flags & KVM_STATE_NESTED_GUEST_MODE)) {
svm_leave_nested(svm);
- goto out_set_gif;
+ svm_set_gif(svm, !!(kvm_state->flags & KVM_STATE_NESTED_GIF_SET));
+ return 0;
}
if (!page_address_valid(vcpu, kvm_state->hdr.svm.vmcb_pa))
@@ -1145,7 +1146,6 @@ static int svm_set_nested_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
load_nested_vmcb_control(svm, ctl);
nested_prepare_vmcb_control(svm);
-out_set_gif:
svm_set_gif(svm, !!(kvm_state->flags & KVM_STATE_NESTED_GIF_SET));
ret = 0;
--
Vitaly
Powered by blists - more mailing lists