linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Add PHY USB3 drivers for Hikey 970

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200911140430.5281b1c3@coco.lan>
Date:   Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:04:30 +0200
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
To:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linuxarm@...wei.com, mauro.chehab@...wei.com,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Yu Chen <chenyu56@...wei.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Add PHY USB3 drivers for Hikey 970

Em Fri, 11 Sep 2020 17:17:11 +0530
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org> escreveu:

> On 10-09-20, 07:52, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > This patch series add the PHY layer needed in order to support the USB
> > functionality on Hikey 970 boards.
> > 
> > v3:
> > - split a namespace patch on two (one with code changes and another
> >   one with dt-bindings changes);
> > - placed just the PHY driver on this series. Another series will add the
> >   USB HUB driver and the DTS changes required to enable USB support
> >   for this board.  
> 
> I have only cover in my inbox, no other patches. Even lore doesn't show
> the series, not sure what happened here

Gah, it sounds that my scripts did something really weird there.

I changed it while sending some docs patches, as, by adding
all maintainers and MLs for each patch on that series to the
cover letter would produce around ~100 e-mail addresses,
which would hardly be accepted by most of the email servers.

It sounds that I ended breaking it :-(

I'll re-send this patch series.

Thanks,
Mauro