[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200911121109.GE26842@paasikivi.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:11:09 +0300
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Cc: linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rajmohan Mani <rajmohan.mani@...el.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>,
Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@...el.com>,
Chiranjeevi Rapolu <chiranjeevi.rapolu@...el.com>,
Hyungwoo Yang <hyungwoo.yang@...el.com>,
linux-media <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 6/6] at24: Support probing while off
Bartosz, Wolfram,
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 01:56:34PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 1:11 PM Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > This currently conflicts with the fix I queued for at24 for v5.9.
> > > Which tree is going to take this series?
> >
> > I recall we agreed on I2C.
> >
>
> Sakari,
>
> can you rebase the at24 driver patch on top of Wolfram's tree as soon
> as he merges my PR with at24 fixes?
I need some additional time with the set, and that may take it beyond
v5.10. Either way, I'll keep you posted.
Thanks.
--
Kind regards,
Sakari Ailus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists