[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200911162712.740d96ec@aktux>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 16:27:12 +0200
From: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: khilman@...nel.org, linux@...linux.org.uk,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, letux-kernel@...nphoenux.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] omap3: enable off mode automatically
On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 13:33:37 +0300
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> wrote:
> * Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info> [200911 09:50]:
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h
> > @@ -49,11 +49,7 @@ static inline int omap4_opp_init(void)
> > extern int omap3_pm_get_suspend_state(struct powerdomain *pwrdm);
> > extern int omap3_pm_set_suspend_state(struct powerdomain *pwrdm, int state);
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_DEBUG
> > extern u32 enable_off_mode;
> > -#else
> > -#define enable_off_mode 0
> > -#endif
>
> Hmm isn't the above still needed for the other SoCs? Or is omap3 the only
> user?
>
well, the linker moans about undefined symbols if
CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3 is not enabled.
I will send a v2.
Regards,
Andreas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists