linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] scsi: ufs-pci: Add LTR support for Intel controllers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 11 Sep 2020 17:01:08 +0300
From:   Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To:     "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc:     "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
        Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>,
        Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] scsi: ufs-pci: Add LTR support for Intel controllers

On 9/09/20 5:06 pm, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 2/09/20 12:27 pm, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> On 2/09/20 5:12 am, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>>>
>>> Adrian,
>>>
>>>> Intel host controllers support the setting of latency tolerance.
>>>> Accordingly, implement the PM QoS ->set_latency_tolerance() callback. The
>>>> raw register values are also exposed via debugfs.
>>>
>>> Does not apply to 5.10/scsi-queue. Please rebase. Thanks!
>>>
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Thanks for processing this.
>>
>> The 5.10/scsi-queue branch seems to be missing the following fix.  If you cherry
>> pick that, then it applies.
> 
> Now there seem to be conflicts between 5.10/scsi-queue and v5.9-rc4.
> I am not sure what I can do?

Now I see it does apply to James' for-next branch.  Can it be applied there?