linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] pinctrl: rockchip: codingstyle for pinctrl-rockchip

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdYGJsK4Ek8pDCeNMWt41dd2s--Lkxewh4Po4E-45UdwMg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 12 Sep 2020 13:27:44 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@...k-chips.com>
Cc:     Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        David Wu <david.wu@...k-chips.com>,
        Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] pinctrl: rockchip: codingstyle for pinctrl-rockchip

Jianqun, Heiko,

On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 9:14 AM Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@...k-chips.com> wrote:

> Do codingstyle for pinctrl-rockchip by spliting driver by SoC types.
>
> Convenienty for reviewing, the first patch only moving
> pinctrl-rockchip.c from driver/pinctrl to driver/pinctrl/rockchip/ .
>
> Jianqun Xu (2):
>   pinctrl: rockchip: new rockchip dir for pinctrl-rockchip
>   pinctrl: rockchip: split rockchip pinctrl driver by SoC type

Why were these patches never applied? Is it my fault?

I don't even have patch 2/2 in my mailbox, possibly it was
too big!

Heiko if you're OK with this change can Jianqun just send a
rebased version?

Yours,
Linus Walleij