[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200912144719.13929-1-trix@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 07:47:19 -0700
From: trix@...hat.com
To: jerome.pouiller@...abs.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] staging: wfx: simplify virt_addr_valid call
From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
Reviewing sram_write_dma_safe(), there are two
identical calls to virt_addr_valid(). The second
call can be simplified by a comparison of variables
set from the first call.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
---
drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c
index 22d3b684f04f..c99adb0c99f1 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static int sram_write_dma_safe(struct wfx_dev *wdev, u32 addr, const u8 *buf,
tmp = buf;
}
ret = sram_buf_write(wdev, addr, tmp, len);
- if (!virt_addr_valid(buf))
+ if (tmp != buf)
kfree(tmp);
return ret;
}
--
2.18.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists