linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/12] 4.14.198-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200912021825.GC50655@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Fri, 11 Sep 2020 19:18:25 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/12] 4.14.198-rc1 review

On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 02:46:54PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.198 release.
> There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun, 13 Sep 2020 12:24:42 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Build results:
	total: 171 pass: 171 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 408 pass: 408 fail: 0

Oh, and I keep forgetting the formal:

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>

Please consider that to be given for all test reports even
if not explicit.

Thanks,
Guenter