[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <160001658182.6915.14152547552697841903.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2020 18:05:17 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
Cc: will@...nel.org, catalin.marinas@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] irqchip/ti-sci: Simplify with dev_err_probe()
On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 19:46:14 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Common pattern of handling deferred probe can be simplified with
> dev_err_probe(). Less code and the error value gets printed.
>
> There is also no need to assign NULL to 'intr->sci' as it is part of
> devm-allocated memory.
Applied to irq/irqchip-next, thanks!
[1/2] irqchip/ti-sci: Simplify with dev_err_probe()
commit: ea6c25e6057c0b7c18337696be84b8f9751f19ec
Patch #2 didn't make a lot of sense, so not applied.
Cheers,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists