[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200913170913.GB2239582@chrisdown.name>
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2020 18:09:13 +0100
From: Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>
To: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Cc: tj@...nel.org, lizefan@...wei.com, hannes@...xchg.org,
corbet@....net, mhocko@...nel.org, vdavydov.dev@...il.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shakeelb@...gle.com, guro@...com,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm: memcontrol: Add the missing numa_stat interface
for cgroup v2
Muchun Song writes:
>In the cgroup v1, we have a numa_stat interface. This is useful for
>providing visibility into the numa locality information within an
>memcg since the pages are allowed to be allocated from any physical
>node. One of the use cases is evaluating application performance by
>combining this information with the application's CPU allocation.
>But the cgroup v2 does not. So this patch adds the missing information.
>
>Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
>Suggested-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
>Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
This is a feature patch, why does this have LKP's Reported-by?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists