linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND v1] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Remove clock for bluetooth on SC7180 IDP board

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200913235118.GD472@uller>
Date:   Sun, 13 Sep 2020 23:51:18 +0000
From:   Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To:     Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Cc:     Venkata Lakshmi Narayana Gubba <gubbaven@...eaurora.org>,
        Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>, mka@...omium.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
        hemantg@...eaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        bgodavar@...eaurora.org, rjliao@...eaurora.org,
        hbandi@...eaurora.org, abhishekpandit@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND v1] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Remove clock for bluetooth
 on SC7180 IDP board

On Fri 11 Sep 07:11 UTC 2020, Marcel Holtmann wrote:

> Hi,
> 

Hi Marcel,

> > Removed voting for RPMH_RF_CLK2 which is not required as it is
> > getting managed by BT SoC through SW_CTRL line.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Venkata Lakshmi Narayana Gubba <gubbaven@...eaurora.org>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts | 1 -
> > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts
> > index 4e9149d..b295d01 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts
> > @@ -348,7 +348,6 @@
> > 		vddrf-supply = <&vreg_l2c_1p3>;
> > 		vddch0-supply = <&vreg_l10c_3p3>;
> > 		max-speed = <3200000>;
> > -		clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_RF_CLK2>;
> > 	};
> > };
> 
> is anybody picking up this patch or should I take it through the bluetooth-next tree?
> 

I've now picked it through the qcom tree.

Thanks,
Bjorn