[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHc6FU6jU3qJppLvs-FrKVt0SryWDs_q9bV_=Lr6rZTwMfv+Tg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 14:29:14 +0200
From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
linux-xfs <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Martin Brandenburg <martin@...ibond.com>,
Mike Marshall <hubcap@...ibond.com>,
Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@....com>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
Qiuyang Sun <sunqiuyang@...wei.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: More filesystem need this fix (xfs: use MMAPLOCK around filemap_map_pages())
Could the xfs mmap lock documentation please be cleaned up? For
example, the xfs_ilock description says:
> * In addition to i_rwsem in the VFS inode, the xfs inode contains 2
> * multi-reader locks: i_mmap_lock and the i_lock. This routine allows
> * various combinations of the locks to be obtained.
The field in struct xfs_inode is called i_mmaplock though, not
i_mmap_lock. In addition, struct inode has an i_mmap_rwsem field which
is also referred to as i_mmap_lock. If that isn't irritating enough.
Thanks,
Andreas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists