linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: memcg: yield cpu when we fail to charge pages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 14 Sep 2020 12:15:27 +0800
From:   Xunlei Pang <xlpang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Julius Hemanth Pitti <jpitti@...co.com>, hannes@...xchg.org,
        mhocko@...nel.org, vdavydov.dev@...il.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:     cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xe-linux-external@...co.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: memcg: yield cpu when we fail to charge pages

On 2020/9/9 AM2:50, Julius Hemanth Pitti wrote:
> For non root CG, in try_charge(), we keep trying
> to charge until we succeed. On non-preemptive
> kernel, when we are OOM, this results in holding
> CPU forever.
> 
> On SMP systems, this doesn't create a big problem
> because oom_reaper get a change to kill victim
> and make some free pages. However on a single-core
> CPU (or cases where oom_reaper pinned to same CPU
> where try_charge is executing), oom_reaper shall
> never get scheduled and we stay in try_charge forever.
> 
> Steps to repo this on non-smp:
> 1. mount -t tmpfs none /sys/fs/cgroup
> 2. mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/memory
> 3. mount -t cgroup none /sys/fs/cgroup/memory -o memory
> 4. mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/0
> 5. echo 40M > /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/0/memory.limit_in_bytes
> 6. echo $$ > /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/0/tasks
> 7. stress -m 5 --vm-bytes 10M --vm-hang 0
> 
> Signed-off-by: Julius Hemanth Pitti <jpitti@...co.com>
> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 0d6f3ea86738..4620d70267cb 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -2652,6 +2652,8 @@ static int try_charge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>  	if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
>  		goto force;
>  
> +	cond_resched();
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * keep retrying as long as the memcg oom killer is able to make
>  	 * a forward progress or bypass the charge if the oom killer
> 

This should be fixed by:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/26/1440

Thanks,
Xunlei