lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ft7klg38.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 14 Sep 2020 14:04:27 +0200
From:   Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc:     Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] KVM: SVM: nested: Initialize on-stack pointers in svm_set_nested_state()

Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org> writes:

> From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
>
> The save and ctl pointers need to be initialized to NULL because there
> is a way through the function in which there is no memory allocated
> for the pointers but where they are freed in the end.
>
> This involves the 'goto out_set_gif' before the memory for the
> pointers is allocated.
>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> Fixes: 6ccbd29ade0d ("KVM: SVM: nested: Don't allocate VMCB structures on stack")
> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
> index 598a769f1961..72a3d6f87107 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
> @@ -1062,8 +1062,8 @@ static int svm_set_nested_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	struct vmcb *hsave = svm->nested.hsave;
>  	struct vmcb __user *user_vmcb = (struct vmcb __user *)
>  		&user_kvm_nested_state->data.svm[0];
> -	struct vmcb_control_area *ctl;
> -	struct vmcb_save_area *save;
> +	struct vmcb_control_area *ctl = NULL;
> +	struct vmcb_save_area *save = NULL;
>  	int ret;
>  	u32 cr0;

Hi Joerg,

this was previously reported by Colin:
https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20200911110730.24238-1-colin.king@canonical.com/

the fix itself looks good, however, I had an alternative suggestion on how
to fix this:
https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/87o8mclei1.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com/

-- 
Vitaly

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ