[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202009141319.FC017B0DB@keescook>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 13:20:34 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@...onical.com>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/15] selftests/seccomp: powerpc: Set syscall return
during ptrace syscall exit
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 03:47:13PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> writes:
> > Some archs (like ppc) only support changing the return code during
> > syscall exit when ptrace is used. As the syscall number might not
> > be available anymore during syscall exit, it needs to be saved
> > during syscall enter. Adjust the ptrace tests to do this.
>
> I'm not that across all the fixture stuff, but if I'm reading it right
> you're now calling change_syscall() on both entry and exit for all
> arches.
Correct.
> That should work, but it no longer tests changing the return code on
> entry on the arches that support it, which seems like a backward step?
That's a good point. I wouldn't be in a position to notice a regression
for the other architectures. I will refactor this one...
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists