linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] Some improvements for blk-throttle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200914053200.GA128318@VM20190228-100.tbsite.net>
Date:   Mon, 14 Sep 2020 13:32:00 +0800
From:   Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     tj@...nel.org, axboe@...nel.dk
Cc:     baolin.wang7@...il.com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Some improvements for blk-throttle

Hi Tejun and Jens,

On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 04:10:12PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> This patch set did some clean-ups, as well as removing some unnecessary
> bps/iops limitation calculation when checking if can dispatch a bio or
> not for a tg. Please help to review. Thanks.

Any comments for this patch set?

> 
> Baolin Wang (5):
>   blk-throttle: Fix some comments' typos
>   blk-throttle: Use readable READ/WRITE macros
>   blk-throttle: Define readable macros instead of static variables
>   blk-throttle: Avoid calculating bps/iops limitation repeatedly
>   blk-throttle: Avoid checking bps/iops limitation if bps or iops is    
>     unlimited
> 
>  block/blk-throttle.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1