linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/26] perf: Introduce mmap3 version of mmap event

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200914223858.GL166601@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 14 Sep 2020 19:38:58 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:     Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Michael Petlan <mpetlan@...hat.com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
        "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
        Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
        Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/26] perf: Introduce mmap3 version of mmap event

Em Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 09:50:45PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 12:31:34PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> 
> SNIP
> 
> > > > ---
> > > >  include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > >  kernel/events/core.c            | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > > >  2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> > > > index 077e7ee69e3d..facfc3c673ed 100644
> > > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> > > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> > > > @@ -384,7 +384,8 @@ struct perf_event_attr {
> > > >                                 aux_output     :  1, /* generate AUX records instead of events */
> > > >                                 cgroup         :  1, /* include cgroup events */
> > > >                                 text_poke      :  1, /* include text poke events */
> > > > -                               __reserved_1   : 30;
> > > > +                               mmap3          :  1, /* include bpf events */
> > > > +                               __reserved_1   : 29;
> > > >
> > > what happens if I set mmap3 and mmap2?
> > > 
> > > I think using mmap3 for every mmap may be overkill as you add useless
> > > 20 bytes to an mmap record.
> > 
> > So use just PERF_RECORD_MMAP2.
> > 
> > I think if the user says: I need buildids, then, in kernels with support
> > for getting the buildid in MMAP records, use it as its more accurate,
> > otherwise fall back to traversing all records at the end to go over lots
> > of files haversting those build-ids.
> 
> ok, so special record option to enable this
> 
> > 
> > If the user says I don't want build-ids, nothing changes, no collection
> > at the end, perf continues using PERF_RECORD_MMAP2.
> 
> and that's -B option in record

Yeah, so if -B is used, MMAP2, otherwise, the best available option,
which is MMAP3, which by now means more how you  tweak the misc bits and
what you collect, buildids or just the maj/min/ino :)

- Arnaldo
 
> > 
> > > I am not sure if your code handles the case where mmap3 is not needed
> > > because there is no buildid, e.g, anonymous memory.
> > > It seems to me you've written the patch in such a way that if the user
> > > tool supports mmap3, then it supersedes mmap2, and thus
> > > you need all the fields of mmap2. But if could be more interesting to
> > > return either MMAP2 or MMAP3 depending on tool support
> > > and type of mmap, that would certainly save 20 bytes on any anon mmap.
> > > But maybe that logic is already in your patch and I missed it.
> > 
> > Right, it should take into account if the user asked for build-ids or
> > not in addition to checking if the kernel supports MMAP3.
> 
> right, thanks,
> 
> jirka
> 

-- 

- Arnaldo